tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5224491.post198222085444954925..comments2023-10-18T08:39:50.104+00:00Comments on Anarchist6[zero]6: Why Climate Denialists Never Seem to Use Coherent Argumentsanarchisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04979135394419507417noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5224491.post-62576357045286557182010-10-16T18:51:38.467+00:002010-10-16T18:51:38.467+00:00Problem I have is in distinguishing an non-looney ...Problem I have is in distinguishing an non-looney from a looney denialist... <br /><br />Perhaps you could help by listing the looney denialists we need to ignore?anarchisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04979135394419507417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5224491.post-81413360323176857572010-10-12T21:34:51.813+00:002010-10-12T21:34:51.813+00:00Ever looked seriously at skeptic arguments present...Ever looked seriously at skeptic arguments presented by non-loonies?<br /><br />Try Climate Skeptic and Climate Audit (then again, neither these deny that CO2 has a warming effect, they just question the 'mainstream' claims of catastrophy)<br /><br />If you look at many 'alarmists' then they use similar language you ascribe to 'denialists' (hell, denialist is such a term -Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com