tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5224491.post8697626556261903229..comments2023-10-18T08:39:50.104+00:00Comments on Anarchist6[zero]6: Denialism: Climate Change, Holocaust & Evolutionanarchisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04979135394419507417noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5224491.post-8275382536898864242010-02-16T01:29:22.722+00:002010-02-16T01:29:22.722+00:00@James Hastings-Trew,
Nice post.
However, nothin...@James Hastings-Trew,<br /><br />Nice post.<br /><br />However, nothing will change belief. Even if you proved that AGW breaks the second law of thermodynamics, you would still be labelled a "denier"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5224491.post-25086594428710590392010-02-16T01:19:18.211+00:002010-02-16T01:19:18.211+00:00You see poor data management, lack of transparency...You see poor data management, lack of transparency, policy driven science, poor alogorithms, small group of self-citing authors, refusal to allow access to data under FOI laws, mistakes galore in reports.<br /><br />You express concerns about this.<br /><br />That means you are a denier.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5224491.post-36341590578618307192009-09-16T07:07:57.968+00:002009-09-16T07:07:57.968+00:00my new debate on denialist here:
http://northward...my new debate on denialist here:<br /><br />http://northwardho.blogspot.comtaiwan77https://www.blogger.com/profile/03772680391560547991noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5224491.post-59594483797387923242009-03-18T17:00:00.000+00:002009-03-18T17:00:00.000+00:00Lots of claims, James - no supporting links as yet...Lots of claims, James - no supporting links as yet?<BR/><BR/>Sounds like denial to me...anarchisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04979135394419507417noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5224491.post-79006493975629801852009-03-11T03:26:00.000+00:002009-03-11T03:26:00.000+00:00There are those of use who are skeptical of the "m...There are those of use who are skeptical of the "mainstream" view of AGW based ON the science. I am not anti-science. This is not like denying the law of gravity, or shape of the earth. I am skeptical of the fundamental assumptions of AGW, because they are not rock-solid science, any more than "ether" or "phlogiston" were rock-solid science in their day. It is fundamental to the scientific Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5224491.post-43973427712639642032009-02-04T23:03:00.000+00:002009-02-04T23:03:00.000+00:00Please excuse me if I'm posting this to the wrong ...Please excuse me if I'm posting this to the wrong place, but I didn't see any other way to contact you. I see that you are a fan of Derrick Jensen, and I thought you might like to see these videos of a recent talk by Derrick:<BR/><BR/>http://essentialdissent.blogspot.com/search?q=derrick+jensen+september+21%2C+2008<BR/><BR/>Also, would you consider linking to my blog? (www.essentialdissent.net)Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17902860970820304963noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5224491.post-19475383652290597332009-02-04T13:31:00.000+00:002009-02-04T13:31:00.000+00:00Apart from those who are skeptical because the sci...Apart from those who are skeptical because the science is poorly done?<BR/>Just as they're skeptical of the poor science surrounding the paranormal. Or are they not allowed to be scientific because they don't accept the party line unquestioningly?<BR/><BR/>Yes, there are many many who are anti-science on the 'denier' side, but there are as many anti-science proponents of man made climate change Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com